The " Paned Browser" is my favourite layout. "auto playlists"), a somewhat flexible interface and excellent documentation. Tag management, an extensive query language with saved searches (i.e. Quod Libet does everything I need from a music player. The first screenshot? Literally looks like my old foobar2000 setup. This time however, I was a bit more thorough and checked the top rated applications, one at a time. I've gone through this list a few times over the last few months but nothing came of it. The front page had some featured music players, none of which I liked, so I clicked through to the "Audio & Video" category.
#Quod libet software
One day when I was doing my weekly software updates, I thought I'd click through Fedora's Software "store" (everything's free). It's similar to foobar2000 without any plugins. It looks almost exactly like foobar2000 to the point where it was uncanny and made me confused. deadbeefĭeaDBeeF was an extremely promising candidate. Please.Īnyways, it was a pain to use, so I kept my eyes open for something else. Yet most software uses the height, rather than all of that empty width. Which brings me to another pet-peeve of mine. I had to create playlists manually and it had this ugly Album/Artist filters along the top reducing the space for listing the actual tracks at the bottom. A very rigid music player that, to say the least, I didn't enjoy using. RhythmboxĪt first, the best music player I could find that was closest to foobar2000 was Rhythmbox.
#Quod libet windows 8
But when push came to shove, in the form of Windows 8 and 10 respectively, I had to move on. It was a big reason why I stuck with Windows (along with games). Moving to Linuxįoobar2000 is Windows-only and closed source. foobar2000 was the best music player available and it did everything I needed it to.
I eventually stumbled upon enough of them to reach a point where I didn't need to look. Off the top of the my head, I don't even remember the plugins I used to get it to be how I want. Extensive documentation is maintained by the community, though that too can be out of date. foobar2000 is quite old now, and plugins are made by individual volunteers so a lot of them don't work. That's more of less what foobar2000 provides with some additional plugins.įinding those plugins is a bit of a pain. I wanted the ability to tag my music however I wanted and run queries against them across my entire library. However, for me the draw was a bit simpler, visually at least. It can be skinned to the point where it looks like a completely different player and that's where a large part of its userbase exists.
A freeware, proprietary music player with a focus on plugins and customisation. When I was using Windows as my primary operating system, I found one solution: foobar2000. It's all just an extremely restricted environment, a far cry from the massive variety of music that's out there to listen to. Their interfaces are rigid and inconsistent. Most are bloated with other features like Lyrics, Wikipedia entries and everything else unrelated to playing music. They put Albums and Artists as the main breakdowns with the option to manually create playlists. Music tastes are entirely subjective, yet the vast majority of Music Players are heavily opinionated in how we consume music. One of my pet peeves when it comes to software are Music Players. 24 Mar, 2020 Quod Libet, the Perfect Music Player
0 kommentar(er)
